Best ICO Events of December 2017

Blockchain & Bitcoin Conference Malta

December 7

Blockchain & Bitcoin Conference is a series of international events that take place in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kyiv, Stockholm, Tallinn, Prague, and now also in Malta. Organizer of the conferences is the international company Smile-Expo, which became a pioneer of the exhibition business in the field of advanced technologies.

The conference will cover such topical issues as ICO holding, trends of the blockchain industry, development of cryptocurrencies and challenges of legislative regulation of the fintech sector

Blockchain Conference Abu Dhabi

December 7

The Blockchain conference in Abu Dhabi creates a platform for the exchange of knowledge, experience and success in the field of the Blockchain technology application in the modern middle eastern world. The conference will open its doors for your future customers, partners and contractors for one day only

Cryptospace. The biggest Eastern Europe Blockchain and Cryptocurrency conference

December 8

All speakers – are top crypto entrepreneurs and authoritative opinion leaders of Blockchain from America, Asia and Europe. Almost everyone – first time in Russia.

Blockchain & Bitcoin Conference Slovenia

December 12

It is one of the first major conferences in the Balkans dedicated to cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. It will bring together industry representatives: from beginning enthusiasts to well-known specialists.     

The conference will focus on the blockchain community of Slovenia and the ways of its further development. Participants will discuss blockchain-based government projects, cryptocurrency regulation in the country, promising activity areas for startups.

 Big ICO Roadshow Moscow

December 12

Only top tier investors, interested in ICO and crypto industry are personally invited. No tickets are available for sale. All attendees by personal invitations only.

CryptoInvestForum

December 14

The first practical conference of participants of the digital financial market. CryptoInvestForum is the largest final event in 2017, where the results of the year will be summed up and the plans for the future will be discussed.

The main topics of the conference are the combination of “fiat” and “digital” financial market regulation, the development of competent legislation in this field, the practice of working in the digital market, the prospects for involving institutional investors in the “crypto”, protecting the rights and interests of the participants of the cryptology.

MONEYMAKERS Conf&Party

December 19

A large-scale conference Moneymakers, dedicated to CPA and Crypto-currencies, will be held on December 19, 2017, in Moscow. The conference will be held in 2 simultaneous streams in different rooms – a separate conference room for CPA, a separate hall for crypto-currencies.  In online MoneyMakers will watch the whole world, and only the best will come.

How to Choose Suitable ICO and Top ICO Trackers in 2019

Recently, the interest of potential investors to new ICOs projects has faded away a little.  It is explained by the fact that the cryptocurrency market has been in the downtrend for more than a year. But despite this, a huge number of new cryptocurrency projects constantly appear on the market. In order to have a convenient opportunity to look at the list of all current ICOs in one place, there have been created special aggregator sites, they are called ICO trackers. In this article, we will talk more about these services, learn about their advantages, disadvantages, and also provide you with a list of the most authoritative sites.

1. What are ICO trackers

So, as it was mentioned above, ICO trackers are specialized services that publish the necessary information about large ICO projects. It is possible to see lists of upcoming, existing or already completed projects on such resources. The main goal is to provide basic information to potential investors. On some of these sites, you can find not only the roadmap of a specific ICO but also its detailed analysis.

The staff of such services is doing a great job, which is aimed at studying the strengths and weaknesses of the blockchain ICO projects. As it is known, a huge number of scammers are concentrated in this area, for this reason, ICO trackers help potential investors navigate this dangerous market.

To understand the principles of such services, let’s take a closer look at the criteria by which projects are evaluated:

  • Risk. In order to compile an estimate for this parameter, the following data is studied: publicity of the development team, White Paper, availability of a test work product, the reputation of consultants and partners, etc.
  • HYPE. This criterion is counted by calculating the number of subscribers on the project pages in social networks, the frequency of its mentioning in the media, search results, etc.
  • Basic report. To evaluate this criterion, the following aspects are closely studied: the innovativeness of used technologies, the presence of its own blockchain, advantages and disadvantages, prospects and possible development options.
  • Investment Rating. According to the analysis, an expert forecast of the future of the project is provided.

All these factors help investors to get comprehensive information about a particular ICO and decide whether to invest their money in it or not.

2. Strengths and weaknesses of ICO trackers

ICO trackers are not perfect and they also have their own advantages and disadvantages.

Advantages

  • Providing basic information about the latest ICO.
  • Compilation and provision of project analysis, which significantly saves time for potential investors.
  • Listing scam projects.

Disadvantages

  • Not all services consist complete information about a specific project.
  • The information provided on the ICO tracker cannot be trusted 100% since such services cooperate with many projects as advertisements. This may mean that published information about a specific ICO may not be objective. For this reason, before starting the ICO funding, it is better to study it yourself.

3. Who needs ICO trackers?

Such services are actively used by investors, people who themselves conduct crowd sales, as well as all other users who are simply interested in this industry. A huge number of fraudsters are concentrated at this market. But despite this, there are really worthwhile projects that can give real profit to their investors, even in such a market. For a non-professional investor, it is quite a difficult task to find such an ICO. Therefore, investors use similar services to obtain key information about recent ICOs.

It should be noted that startups themselves are very willing to use ICO trackers because, such services are an excellent marketing tool for them.

4. List of popular ICO trackers in 2019

Recently, a sufficient number of ICO-trackers have appeared on the market. Each service has its own approach and its own criteria for evaluating new ICO coins. It is possible to find detailed information about ICO projects on larger sites, and some services simply publish WP with a link to the official project resource.

Here is a short list of popular and current ICO trackers in 2019 (according to the rating for 2018).

5. Conclusion

There are many scammers on the ICO market, lists of which can be found on specialized services – ICO trackers. Such sites allow investors to obtain key information about ICO projects.

These are certainly very useful services, but it is important to remember that ICO trackers are not the last resort, so before investing money in a certain project, it is better to search for information about it on the network.

Subscribe to The Coin Shark news in Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/coinshark/

The CEO of Circle Believes That a Clearer Policy of the SEC Will Cure the Crypto Industry

The CEO of the project Circle, backed up by the major bank Goldman Sachs, Jeremy Allaire started a thread on Reddit together with his co-workers, where they debated the accomplishments of the company in the recent time, talked about prospects for the future and discussed the overall situation on the crypto market.

According to the representatives of Circle, one of the main issues with crypto in the US is the lack of regulatory framework and, most importantly, the inability of the Securities and Exchange Commission to clearly define cryptocurrencies as belonging to a particular type of assets.

We remind you:

The SEC: Unlike ICO Tokens, Bitcoin and Ethereum Can Not Be Securities

There absolutely needs to be more regulatory clarity to really make this fly — in particular around who can issue these, how they can be stored and transmitted, and what markets can allow their trading. There’s a lot of attention on this and we absolutely expect to see these issues resolved and for far more real world experiments to hit the markets this year,” said Jeremy Allaire.

Also, the CEO of Circle claimed that the US should follow the example of France and have a separate kind of taxation for crypto-to-crypto transactions.

Subscribe to The Coin Shark news in Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/coinshark/

Two European Finance Regulators Urge the EU To Adopt Crypto and ICO Rules

Cryptocurrency and ICO regulations have been an open topic in Europe for quite a long period of time. Some finance regulators claim that it is high time the European Commission determined the place of crypto and ICO in European economy.

The European Banking Authority (EBA) stated that the current crypto asset-related activities did not comply with the EU financial laws, so that The EBA urged the EU to look into the crypto rules and identify what actions may be required at the EU level.

The representative of the EBA said:

“The EBA’s warnings to consumers and institutions on virtual currencies remain valid. The EBA calls on the European Commission to assess whether regulatory action is needed to achieve a common EU approach to crypto-assets. The EBA continues to monitor market developments from a prudential and consumer perspective.”

Moreover, the EBA advised to use the FATF’s recommendations. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is to issue a set of recommendations for crypto-related action in June 2019.

Another finance regulator, which supports the EBA, is the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). It released a report which helps the authorities of the EU to make decisions on rules applied to crypto and ICO.

The spokesman of the ESMA said:

“Our survey of NCAs highlighted that some crypto-assets may qualify as MiFID financial instruments, in which case the full set of EU financial rules would apply. However, because the existing rules were not designed with these instruments in mind, NCAs face challenges in interpreting the existing requirements and certain requirements are not adapted to the specific characteristics of crypto-assets.”

We remind you

Seven EU Member States United To Adopt Blockchain In Their Countries

Subscribe to The Coin Shark news in Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/coinshark/

“51% Attack” Hit Ethereum Classic: A Full Analysis Of The Process

As we have reported earlier, Ethereum Classic was hit by 51% attack, it means that hackers obtained more than 50% of network’s mining hashrate.

A Malicious “51% Attack” Hit Ethereum Classic, The Loss Allegedly Accounts For $460 000

Slowmist, Chinese-based blockchain journal, has released a full report on the attack. The earliest hit occured on January 5, the culprit hacked some exchanges, like Bitrue, Coinbase, Gate.io, however, this was noticed only two days later.

The first action was a transfer of more than 5000 ETC from Binance to the criminal’s address 0x24fdd25367e4a7ae25eef779652d5f1b336e31da. This amount of coins moved to a mining node, that created block 7254355. After that, the hacker deposited 4000 ETC to Bitrue exchange in block 7254430, yet, this transaction vanished from the Ethereum Classic chain. Another 9000 ETC was stolen in the same way. The Bitrue address 0x2c9a81a120d11a4c2db041d4ec377a4c6c401e69 no longer exists, and the official history is clear. Though, Bitrue managed to save some records:

The scheme of the hacker attack is simple:

  • make a deposit;
  • withdraw to a safe address;
  • to double coins – just move the coins to other addresses.

One of the biggests victims is Coinbase exchange. It was estimated that the loss from the attack accounts for $1 million. The above-mentioned report also provides the information about two attacker addresses which were blackmailed by Coinbase later. They are:

– 0x090a4a238db45d9348cb89a356ca5aba89c75256
0x07ebd5b21636f089311b1ae720e3c7df026dfd72

In Twitter, one of users (nickname: @OGBTC) claimed that he knew the culprit personally.

https://twitter.com/OGBTC/status/1082559086070136832

Another user (nickname: @sebseb7) indicated that it was he who knew the hacker.

The “51% Attack” is over for now. All we can do is to estimate the losses and to take measures so that it will not happen again.

The report also stated:

“[W]e recommend that all digital asset services platform block transfers from the above malicious wallet addresses. And strengthen the risk control, maintain a high degree of attention, and be alert to double spend attacks that may erupt at any time.”

We remind you:

The Dark Overlord Threatens To Reveal The Truth of 9/11 Attacks Unless Ransom in Bitcoin is Paid

Subscribe to The Coin Shark news in Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/coinshark/

GMO Will Keep On Mining Bitcoins at a Different Location

One of the world’s largest IT companies, Japan-based GMO has published its monthly report regarding its mining activities and the profits coming from them.

We remind you:

Japanese GMO Releases a Monthly Update: What Has Changed As For Mining?

Based on the December’s document, the revenue from mining cryptocurrency has dropped down  significantly which implies that immediate measures must be taken.

One of the biggest pitfalls of mining is the amount of electricity consumed and its high price. Thus, GMO made a decision to relocate its main mining center into a different area, where electricity will cost way less.

We will relocate the mining center to a region that will allow us to secure less expensive power supply,” reads the report.

Moreover, the company refuted all the rumors regarding its alleged plans of giving up mining completely. Since 2017, when GMO first engaged into mining, it has earned massive profits and still sees potential in crypto.

As we may see in the statistical data, the mining reward for Bitcoin increased a lot in the last month of December, whereas Bitcoin Cash suffered a hard fall. But the crash of the crypto market and Bitcoin in particular could not be controlled by GMO and affected its business quite badly, making it “move houses”.

Subscribe to The Coin Shark news in Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/coinshark/

A Malicious “51% Attack” Hit Ethereum Classic, The Loss Allegedly Accounts For $460 000

An operator of Ethereum Classic mining pool has confirmed that a 51% attack has hit ETC network on January 7. This attack refers to a malicious attack on blockchain when hackers obtained more than 50% of mining hashrate of network.

The hackers got the ability to reorganize blocks and even replace them on blockchain, moreover, the culprits are able to “double spend” coins, i.e. the same coins can be transferred several times.

The rumours that ETC has been experiencing a hacker attack originally appeared on CoinNess, Chinese journal on the 6th of January. The report says that SlowMist, Chinese blockchain security firm, was the first to notice the attack.

The article reads:

“The ETC community followed up on the development of the incident immediately and learned that there is a private mining pool…that achieves more than 50% of the total network hashrate at certain times.”

The spokesman of Ethereum Classic has responded in Twitter, saying the network “operated normally”.

However, in just a few hours, the representative asked all mining pools to “allow a significantly higher confirmation time on withdrawals and deposits (+400).”

Later, without any confirmation or comment, the official account of Ethereum Classic retweeted the report made by Chinese journal.

On January 7, the cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase has posted a report saying that they detected this attack on the 5th of January. Mark Nesbitt, Coinbase Security Engineer, who wrote that report, stated that since the disclosure of malicious attack, there had been 8 chain reorganizations worth approximately $460,000.

Ethereum Classic refuted to the report of Coinbase, claiming that the later did not “connect  with ETC personnel regarding the attack.”

While it is still unknown who was the first to detect the malicious attack and what are the consequences of it, we want to remind you

The Dark Overlord Threatens To Reveal The Truth of 9/11 Attacks Unless Ransom in Bitcoin is Paid

Subscribe to The Coin Shark news in Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/coinshark/