CryptoPunk # 7557 wurde fälschlicherweise für 3% seines realen Wertes verkauft
A non-fungible token from the popular CryptoPunk collection numbered 7557 was sold for 4.444 ETH, which was about 3% of the average market value of this asset.
According to the creators of the expensive collection of pixelated avatars, CryptoPunk #7557 is not the most typical, since only 55 out of 10,000 non-fungible tokens they generate have an identical tiara. The cheapest of its kind "punks" today costs over 350 ETH (over $1.55 million), and in the last sale, a punk with a tiara was sold for 196.69 ETH, which is equivalent to $873,303.
Most likely, the sale was a catastrophic mistake for the previous owner of this NFT. Since he last priced his non-fungible token at 8,888 ETH (over $31 million), this hints at an estimated price of 4,444 ETH ($19.73 million) rather than 4,444 ETH $19,731).
The buyer, in turn, struggled to acquire the token as soon as possible, connecting the flashbots service for this in order to conclude a deal with the miners and “knock out” a profitable place in the queue. Given the potential benefits of the transaction he conducted, this rush was hardly surprising. To do this, the buyer sent a “bribe” to F2Pool in the amount of 3.33 ETH (about $14,785).
Shortly after the acquisition, a new seller listed CryptoPunk #7557 at 325 ETH, or $1.44 million. The last rate for this “punk” was 180 ETH (more than $771,480) at the time of the proposal.
As a reminder, the largest transaction involving tokens from the Larva Labs collection took place last week. However, it turned out that the person who bought the token for 124,457 ETH or $532 million bought it from himself, using a trick using a flash loan.
Make history, trade and earn on OpenSea.
Coin Shark is not responsible for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products or any other content posted on the site. This article is for informational purposes, prepared on the basis of materials and information from open sources. Cryptocurrency is a high-risk asset, investments in it can lead to losses. Readers should do their own research before taking any action.